Drinking (And Work)

While the initial premise of this essay may seem blatantly obvious to some, to others it is an already accepted way of life (at least tacitly). The role that alcohol plays in the current sphere of the capitalist state is widely disregarded and shrugged off by most who consider themselves ‘normal’ members of these societies. I’m not talking about alcoholism as a disease (which could be covered in many, many more pages); but rather alcohol as something for today’s modern worker bees to not only crave, but to plan their lives outside of the ‘work week’ around (who would go to a party with no booze these days? seriously?). I am guilty of this, as most of us who live within these avenues of normalcy are. You had a long day working so you could be afforded the luxury of food in your stomach and a roof over your head (because, as you know, “not everyone is lucky enough to live in America”). Once these most basic of needs are satisfied, you crave very little more than self liberation. The feeling of some sort of relative freedom. Freedom like a Bar Stool. I know, getting smooshed with your mates after a tough day/week/year/lifetime in the Western world is quite the adventure into personal liberation for you. You do this almost as instinctively as eating, sleeping, fucking, working…

We may need to dive a bit deeper into the realm of the subconscious to really analyze the various neurological conditions involved. But I’m not a doctor so we’ll skip that for now. What we can do is look at what the modern working conditions for many different types of people employed in the industrialized world. By conditions, it must be stated that the ones we must speak of are generally more mental than physical, at least for some. There are many different types of work; nearly all are (not to sound too Marxist) alienating to the true nature of one’s self… Pre-determined and accepted in subconscious self-defeat… How many people truly, genuinely, love their fucking job, and have been doing the same thing for years on end? How many of you would honestly do what you do for money, right now, if you could be doing anything else in the world? The question is hypothetical and a bit abstract (we can’t imagine a world without *gulp* money!!) But many of us, or most of us, would probably rather be spending our time doing something much more self-satisfying than working for something that’s as shockingly abstract as money (think about it). It’s true and we all know it! So what’s one thing we can all easily do about it? No, the answer (of course) isn’t to stand up to the people who are actually trying to ruin our lives; that would make too much sense, as there are plenty more of “us” than of “them.” The solution is to have a beer or two or five or ten! At least this is the case for many folks who are subconsciously unhappy with their current way of life. Many of these same beautiful individuals are often the life of the party! The professional drinkers (everyone knows that when you feed this clown 8 shots of tequila something ape shit is gonna go down!) manage to pull this off exceedingly well, this façade of feeling well; the mirage of an American Dream.

…”Normal”….

Normalcy equates to acceptance. Acceptance is so damn tempting, and it’s ubiquitous. Very little is easier than giving in and accepting. Basically, we are looking for some seal of approval from nearly everyone around us. That is why we do everything it is that we do. Part of this mass acceptance orgy is the drinking culture. There is a certain camaraderie involved with sharing a room with a bunch of (mostly) strangers and drinking yourself into oblivion. No one is going to judge you (for the drinking part of it all anyway) and this sort of tacit understanding between all in attendance is a form of acceptance. And goddamn, does it feel good. On the surface, as an isolated incident, this would not be cause for any serious concern. However, when outside factors involved are probed, the picture becomes as hazy as your vision after a 9 hour binge. The most important thing for us to realize is that there is something fundamentally wrong with craving intoxication in our day to day lives.  There is a more natural way to feeling liberated.

It always starts with the advertising. From a young age, advertisements flooded our eyes, ears, and brains with millions of slogans, logos, and ‘acceptable’ ways to live our lives. As a soon to be well-known philosopher  once said, “There are no accidents in the Republic.” When applied to marketing the consumption of alcohol to people in industrialized societies, this perspective glares eerily true. This sort of functioning alcoholism amongst a vast majority of young workers is manufactured and then encouraged by the capitalist paradigm. I wouldn’t be surprised if the government had a stake in all major breweries in some way or another (conspiracy theorists, you can have this one). For one, it is one of the few drugs that is actual legal in the eyes of the state. Aside from pharmaceuticals and tobacco (which are on a different part of the same spectrum of which we are currently speaking), alcohol is the only legitimate drug to abuse (with relative responsibility). And the penalties for breaking any number of  minor laws regarding the drug are, in the big picture of things, quite mundane and soft when compared to penalties handed out for other ‘illegal’ drugs. It may even be argued that alcohol has ruined more lives in the industrialized world than every other ‘illegal’ drug combined. I will not bore you with statistics; if you are so inclined I am sure the ‘google’ function will steer you in the right direction. However, it is extremely important to realize the type of culture that we are being urged to sustain. Five days of dread followed by two of relative liberation and freedom from capitalist labor. And what to do with the evenings of such days of freedom?- Forget about the other five days.

… and that is exactly how it is expected to go (using the ‘no accidents in the Republic’ philosophy). Don’t let your habits effect your work, but let your habits subdue you to the point of not caring about 71% of your days. Functioning alcoholism in obedience with the State. The fact that they have been able to separate our lives into two or more different segments (work, social, etc) and have trained us to accept giving them roughly 70% of our time is quite outstanding. Now, I suppose it would be extremely narrow minded to have this issue perceived as only a working class issue; it is very obviously not. But the elite and wealthy drink for different reasons (whether they know it or not). The abstract concept of money is not going to make them happy. There is nothing self liberating about wealth. It is also important to address this issue to further question what exactly it is we are working for. If money, and the freedoms that such abstractions can bring, do not make the rich truly happy, then what is the point of working to amass capital?

The next part of the socialization process, after advertising, is the post-secondary education party culture. This is where the future ‘middle class’ learns how exactly t0 perfect the scheme of functioning alcoholism. By this point, most of our brains have already adapted to the 5 days on, 2 days off philosophy and have embraced it wholly through years of the education system. The process of struggling through five days of studies, writing papers, attending classes and the like followed by a two day hiatus of binge drinking and parties is solidly in place as priming future wage slaves for an obedient working life. The combination of drugs with tiny parcels of entertainment (sports, music, television, etc) is enough for most folks to forget about the rest of their lives. Today’s college campuses, at least in my brief yet varied experiences, lack the overall revolutionary ideologies of generations past. This isn’t to say that all college campuses are the same, or that all college students get lost in the cesspool. But we can agree that an overwhelming majority of state universities across the United States are producing far more ants than scorpions. Instead of advancing upon liberating principles of the 60s and 70s (and, honestly, the end result of resistance in the 60s and 70s, aside from minor scratches on the surface of ‘civil rights,’ did little to clog the capitalist cog from turning, let alone from shifting gears), we have regressed into an even more oppressive capitalist state than ever before. However, the educated (former) middle-class is just one example of structured self-medication and functional alcoholism. Many of these people are the same ones residing in modern cities across the country and globe. This is where the paradigm must be ignited.

In summation, I am not out-and-out shit-talking drinking; no one has ever said anything about becoming a straight-edge culture, nor would we necessarily want such a culture to exist. But the beer shouldn’t need to be the life of the party. There is another way to feeling a lot better than you do after a 12 pack. A certain amount of awareness needs to be raised about the issue of the capitalists stance on alcohol consumption, as part of breaking the spell they have cast on us and striving for a better life. Sure, mixed messages are sent from the powers-that-be, but after only a small bit of insight, it is plain to see that they want us at least mildly intoxicated most of the time, thus protecting their precious glass status-quo. However, let it be said: When we are dancing on the rubble of the tower the (former) ruling class has madly created, we are going to throw the biggest fucking party in modern history, and everyone is invited.

Why I Won’t Be Voting for Obama This Time

The first time I voted was the 2004 general election. I’ve been eligible to vote since 1998. I never stayed home on election day because of apathy or laziness. I avoided the ballot box because I sincerely believed our democracy was a sham. I believed that voting and participating in that sham was a form of acquiescence. If I were to make my way to the polling station and cast my vote for one of two equally loathsome candidates, each of them pre-purchased by their corporate contributors, I would essentially be capitulating to an election system that is dominated almost entirely by the interests of the wealthy few at the expense of the common good. If my loathsome candidate loses, and the other loathsome candidate starts two wars that morally and financially bankrupt the country, I’m complicit because I participated in, and therefore legitimized, that process. I believed that casting a vote in that system was ultimately casting a vote for that system. So I refused. But then Bush happened. And when it was time for his second term, I had a change of heart. The stakes were too high. Our country was moving irretrievably to the right. So I participated… desperately…and futilely.

And then came Barack Obama. Our savior. We were moths – we young voters – caught in the glow of his youthfulness and charisma. He was cool and different and “progressive.” He was promising us all this change. He was going to help us wrest the country from the ornery old rich men that had whipped and demoralized it for too long. Yes we could!

But we didn’t. Now, I don’t want to get into all the things Barack Obama hasn’t done. I know there’s a whole list of Democratic talking points about the things he has done. None of that has an impact on my decision not to vote for him. I’m basing this decision on two factors. The first is this: the FBI and Department of Homeland Security are helping coordinate the crackdowns on Occupy movements across the country. This is the Executive branch of the Federal Government. This is the branch of government over which President Obama has direct control. This is President Obama helping coordinate violent police raids of Occupy encampments all over the nation. This is President Obama violently suppressing the First Amendment rights of Occupy protesters. That’s what you vote for if you vote for Obama.

The second factor is that I believe the combination of a Republican presidency, Republican Congress, and Republican Supreme Court will do much more to galvanize and advance the Occupy movement. Some may find that to be soul-crushingly cynical, but I disagree. I think it’s a solid long-term strategy for challenging a corrupt system; one in which we use our opponent’s weakness against it (our opponent being unrestrained capitalism and its weakness being a greed-fueled disregard for economic justice and equality). I’m not saying we should support the other guy, whoever that might be (ahem-Mitt Romney). I couldn’t possibly word-fuck my way into a moral justification for voting Republican. What I am suggesting is that we should all just sit this one out, and do so in an obvious way. We should start “Block the Vote” campaigns. We should actively and publicly pledge to support no one for President. We can make t-shirts and bumper stickers. We can go door to door encouraging people not to vote for President.

Our fight is with rampant capitalism, economic inequality, and corporate control of government. We know that if the Republicans get to do it their way, they’ll continue to march even farther along that path. And with each step taken in that direction, our voices grow louder and our message becomes more immediate. Why settle for the few scraps the establishment liberals are willing to toss our way to shut us up when we can make this movement powerful enough to demand a seat at the table?

NYPD Should Stop Doing This:

Salon.com is reporting, via Harry Siegel at the Daily News, that NYPD has apparently launched an unsurprisingly cynical campaign to discredit Occupy Wall Street.  NYPD officers are now telling people found drinking in other city parks to “take it to Zuccotti.”  Siegel also reports that the police may have been coached as to what to say when protesters complain about aggressive or intoxicated individuals inside the park:  ”He’s got a right to express himself, you’ve got a right to express yourself.”

Read the full Salon story here.

Read the Daily News story here.

Demand #9

We demand fully subsidized public education through the post-secondary level for all willing and able citizens. We demand further that all public schools be funded equally based on the the number of students enrolled, and not on factors such as geographic location or community wealth.  This should be accomplished at the Federal level by shifting the necessary funding from our Department of Defense budget to the Department of Education. Funds should then be distributed to the states based on need.

“Requests” From OccupyMARINES

Marines are trained to be professional and courteous when interacting with civilians. They tend to begin negotiations by making “requests,” not demands. OccupyMARINES made the following statement regarding Marine veteran, and Occupier, Scott Olsen:

Our Brother Marine Corps Veteran Scott Olsen Remains In The Hospital Under Critical Condition From Sustaining A Blow To The Head From An Oakland Police Department Riot Officer Projectile Early Wednesday Morning October 25, 2011. 

OccupyMARINES Have Watched Closely The Response From The OPD, The Mayor, The Governor, And All Others Involved In The Oakland Attack On Peaceful Demonstrators; We Have Observed These Pathetic Cowards Refuse Responsibility For Their Actions That May Very Well Alter The Course Of Our Brother’s Life. Additionally, Many Other Police Departments Nationwide Deploy Similar Riot Tactics Against Demonstrators Honoring The OWS 8, A Peaceful Declaration Of Assembly; We Will Organize Peacefully Against These Departments. 

In Response To The Oakland Shooting Of Scott Olsen OccupyMARINES Request The Following:

See their requests here.

Demand #8

We demand an amendment to the U.S. Constitution which restricts and regulates the lobbying of elected or appointed officials and their staff. Any and all petitioning of elected or appointed officials, or their staff, which is performed by, or on behalf of, a corporation, labor union, industry or trade organization, or political action committee should be conducted in a transparent and public forum. The Supreme Court has allowed time,  place, and manner restrictions on the people’s right to peaceably assemble and present their government with a redress of grievances. We see no reason why lobbying should not be similarly restricted as to time, place and manner. Any lobbying conducted outside of a public forum, and which includes any offering of money, political contributions, goods, services, or any other item of value should be considered bribery and should be punishable under the appropriate criminal statute.